The Pursuit of Reason and Certainty in Epistemology: A Comparative Study of Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī, René Descartes and Karl Popper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64984/ijcd.1.2.2024.01Keywords:
Epistemological certainty, Falsifiability, Cartesian doubt, Kashf (Divine Illumination), Critical RationalismAbstract
Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī, René Descartes and Karl Popper are towering figures though separated by centuries, traditions and cultures, – the similarities in their skeptical approaches have long intrigued scholars. The trio turned to the method of doubt in the pursuit of certainty in epistemology. Each thinker, faced with the prevalence of error and uncertainty in human beliefs, undertook a profound examination of knowledge, casting into doubt received opinions and the reliability of ordinary cognition. They aimed to secure an indubitable foundation for truth (with the exception of Karl Popper). Yet, the methods they employed, the ultimate resolutions they reached, and the philosophical implications of their skepticism diverge in important ways, reflecting their distinct historical contexts and philosophical goals. The introductory section of the current study will enumerate: 1) al-Ghazali’s journey from skepticism to mystical certainty; 2) Descartes skeptic journey that leads him to seek refuge in rationalist metaphysics. 3) Popper as a modern science philosopher to ascertain knowledge without certainty. The next sections will provide a detailed comparative reflection of Major epistemological themes of the trio. The paper shall conclude by analyzing which epistemological view among the three is most effective in 21st century onwards by contrasting their critiques on epistemology over time.
Downloads
References
Agassi, Joseph. Popper and His Popular Critics: Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend and Imre Lakatos. Springer, 2014.
Akdogan, Cemil. “Ghazali, Descartes, and Hume: The Genealogy of Some Philosophical Ideas.” Islamic Studies 42 (3), (2003): 487–502, https://doi.org/10.2307/20837288.
Albertini, Tamara. “Crisis and Certainty of Knowledge in AlGhazālī (10581111) and Descartes (15961650).” Philosophy East and West 55 (1), (2005): 1–14, https://doi.org/10.2307/4487933.
Broughton, Janet. Descartes’s Method of Doubt. Princeton, Nj: Princeton Univ. Press, 2003.
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. II, translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Gombay, Andre. Descartes: Blackwell Great Mind Series. edited by Steven Nedler. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
Hammerton, M. “Bayesian statistics and Popper's epistemology." Mind 77, no. 305 (1968): 109-112.
Hansson, Sven Ove. “Defining Pseudoscience and Science.” Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (2013): 61-77.
Ibrahim, T., and N. V. Efremova. “On Averroes’ Response to al-Ghazali’s Critique of Philosophy.” Minbar. Islamic Studies 13 (2), (2020): 378-400, (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2020-13-2-378-400.
Jeffrey, Richard C. “Probability and Falsification: Critique of the Popper Program.” Synthese 30, no. 1/2 (1975): 95-117.
Jordan, Jason. “Occasionalism.”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022, https://iep.utm.edu/occasion/
Kadir, Surni. “Comparative Study of Al-Ghazali Thought and Ibn Rushd in the Perspective of Islamic Theology.” International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) 6, no. 3 (2024): 895-903.
Khashoggi, Kamal-e-din. “Inverting the Void: A Comparison of al-Ghazālī and Descartes.” Master's Thesis, Boston University, 2016.
Lakatos, Imre. “Science and Pseudoscience.” Philosophical papers 1 (1978): 1-7.
Marmura, Michael E. The Incoherence of the Philosophers: A Parallel English-Arabic Text. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 2000.
Millican, Peter. “Hume on Reason and Induction: Epistemology or Cognitive Science?” Hume Studies 24 (1), (1998): 141–59, https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2011.0088.
Maxwell, Nicholas. “Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and Aim-Oriented Empiricism.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.5219 (2012).
O'Hear, Anthony, ed. Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Parvin, Phil, ed. Major Conservative and Libertarian Thinkers Series: Karl Popper. Vol. 14. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd, 2010.
Popper, Karl. After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings. Edited by Jeremy Shearmur and Piers Norris Turner. Canada: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.
Popper, Karl R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. New One-Volume Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
Popper, Karl R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 1963.
Popper, Karl. Three Worlds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1979.
Popper, Karl R. “Reason or Revolution?” European Journal of Sociology/Archives (Européennes de Sociologie) 11, no. 2 (1970): 252-262.
Popper, Karl R. “Science as Falsification.” Conjectures and Refutations 1, no. 1963 (1963): 33-39.
Reilly, Robert R. The Closing of the Muslim Mind. Open Road Media, 2014.
Shea, Brendan. “Karl Popper: Philosophy of Science.” (2011), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://philpapers.org/archive/SHEKPP-3.pdf
Simon Van Den Bergh (translator)., Averroes’s Tahafut Al-Tahafut: (The Incoherence of the Incoherence). Volumes I and II.Cambridge: Gibb Memorial Trust, 2008.
Sky, Amy. “Moving in Mystical Ways: The Dialectic of al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd in Islamic Epistemology.” HiPo: The Langara Student Journal of History and Political Science 5 (2022): 9-14.
Soleh, Achmad Khudori., Erik Sabti Rahmawati, Humaida Ghevira Syavia Camila, and Hasyma Tazakka Furqona. “The truth on Al-Ghazali Perspective.” International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education 2, no. 9 (2023): 431-439.
“Solipsism” 2020. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/solipsism.
Stemwedel, Janet. “Drawing the Line between Science and Pseudo-Science.” Scientific American (2011), https://faculty.knox.edu/fmcandre/science_vs_pseudoscience.pdf
Tukiran, Martinus. “How Management Science Obtains Empirical Truth: A Review of Karl Popper's Critical Rationalism and Criticism of Thomas Kuhn and Imre Lakatos.” Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy 25, no. 2 (2024): 232-252.
Wilson, Margaret Dauler., and Ted Honderich. Descartes. London: Routledge, 2016.
Zamir, Syed Rizwan. “Descartes and Al-Ghazālī: Doubt, Certitude and Light.” Islamic Studies (2010): 219-251.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
