From Interfaith Contact to Support for Coexistence: The Mediating Role of Islamic Pluralism Orientation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64984/ijcd.3.1.2026.31Keywords:
interfaith contact, contact quality, Islamic pluralism orientation, peacebuilding orientation, structural equation modelling, mediationAbstract
Religious diversity makes interfaith encounters routine in many societies, yet the mechanisms linking such contact to peace-supportive civic orientations remain unclear. This study examines whether the quantity and quality of interfaith contact are associated with peace building orientation/support for coexistence, indirectly through Islamic pluralism orientation, defined as an identity-compatible endorsement of equal civic respect and cooperative coexistence. Using survey data from 220 Muslim adults in Pakistan, confirmatory factor analysis supported the distinctiveness of key constructs. Structural equation modelling showed that both contact quantity and, more strongly, contact quality were positively associated with Islamic pluralism orientation, which in turn was positively associated with peace building orientation. Bootstrapped indirect effects indicated that pluralism orientation statistically accounted for the association between contact (quantity and quality) and peace building orientation. Findings are interpreted as indirect association patterns rather than causal mediation. Overall, results highlight an identity-compatible pluralism orientation as a theoretically grounded pathway through which everyday interfaith contact, especially high-quality contact, relates to civic support for coexistence.
Downloads
References
Allport, Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, 1954.
Barlow, Fiona Kate., Stefania Paolini, Anne Pedersen, Matthew J Hornsey, Helena R M Radke, Jake Harwood, Mark Rubin, Chris G Sibley. “The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (12): 1629–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
Broccoli, Erika., Virginia Canegallo, Erika Santoddì, Mauro Cavarra, and Rosa Angela Fabio. “Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Peace Attitudes Scale.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 27 (3), (2021): 512–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000508 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000508
Brown, Timothy A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Guilford Press, 2015.
Cohen, Jacob. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
DeVellis, Robert F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 4th ed. SAGE, 2017.
Fornell, Claes., and David F. Larcker. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), (1981): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Hässler, Tabea., Johannes Ullrich, Michelle Bernardino, et al. “A Large-Scale Test of the Link Between Intergroup Contact and Support for Social Change.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (2020): 380–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
Henseler, Jörg., Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1), (2015): 115–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hu, Li-tze., and Peter M. Bentler. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1), (1999): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huber, Stefan., and Odilo W. Huber. “The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).” Religions 3 (3), (2012): 710–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Islam, Mir Rabiul., and Miles Hewstone. “Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Out-Group Attitude: An Integrative Model.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (6), (1993): 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005
Kanas, Agnieszka., Peer Scheepers, and Carl Sterkens. “Positive and Negative Contact and Attitudes Towards the Religious Out-Group: Testing the Contact Hypothesis in Conflict and Non-Conflict Regions of Indonesia and the Philippines.” Social Science Research 63 (2017): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.019 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.019
Kline, Rex B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. Guilford Press, 2016.
Köbrich, Julia., Borja Martinović, and Tobias H. Stark. “Interreligious Contact and Attitudes in Togo and Sierra Leone: The Role of Ingroup Norms and Individual Preferences.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 30 (3), (2024): 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000702 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000702
Köbrich, Julia., Tobias H. Stark, Borja Martinović, and Yawo Seyram Adiakpo. “Overcoming Barriers to Interreligious Peace: Determinants of Preferences for Religiously Similar Others in Togo and Sierra Leone.” Political Psychology 46 (6), (2025): 1440–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13062 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13062
Kuranbek, Asset., Zhakhangir Nurmatov, Sultanmurat Abzhalov, Turganbay Abdrassilov, Mukhit Tolegenov. “Interactive Pluralism and Religious Tolerance: An Experimental Study of Muslim–Christian Dialogue in Kazakhstan.” Journal of Religion and Health (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02489-y . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02489-y
Landmann, Helen., Robert Gaschler, and Anette Rohmann. “What Is Threatening About Refugees? Identifying Different Types of Threat and Their Association with Emotional Responses and Attitudes Towards Refugee Migration.” European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (7), (2019): 1401–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593
Maoz, Ifat. “Does Contact Work in Protracted Asymmetrical Conflict? Appraising 20 Years of Reconciliation-Aimed Encounters Between Israeli Jews and Palestinians.” Journal of Peace Research 48 (1), (2011): 115–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310389506 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310389506
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy., Seth A. Green, and Donald P. Green. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3 (2), (2019): 129–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25
Peacock, Lucy. “Contact-Based Interfaith Programmes in Schools and the Changing Religious Education Landscape: Negotiating a Worldviews Curriculum.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 44 (1), (2021): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.2004708 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.2004708
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5), (2006): 751–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
—. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (2008): 922–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), (2003): 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Preacher, Kristopher J., and Andrew F. Hayes. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40 (2008): 879–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Riek, Blake M., Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner. “Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (4), (2006): 336–53. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
Shrout, Patrick E., and Niall Bolger. “Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations.” Psychological Methods 7 (4), (2002): 422–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Spierings, Niels. “The Multidimensional Impact of Islamic Religiosity on Ethno-Religious Social Tolerance in the Middle East and North Africa.” Social Forces 97 (4), (2019): 1693–1730. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy092 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy092
Stephan, Walter G., Rolando Diaz-Loving, and Anne Duran. “Integrated Threat Theory and Intercultural Attitudes: Mexico and the United States.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31 (2), (2000): 240–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006
Taylor, Laura K., Vivian Liu, Beth Corbett, et al. “A Global Youth Peacebuilding Beliefs Scale.” Communications Psychology 4 (1), (2026): Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00340-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00340-4
Velthuis, Evi., Maykel Verkuyten, and Anouk Smeekes. “The Different Faces of Social Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Respect and Coexistence Tolerance.” Social Indicators Research 158 (3), (2021): 1105–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02724-5 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02724-5
Verkuyten, Maykel., Mieke Maliepaard, Borja Martinović, and Yassine Khoudja. “Political Tolerance among Muslim Minorities in Western Europe: The Role of Denomination and Religious and Host National Identification.” Politics and Religion 7 (2), (2014): 265–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048314000212 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048314000212
Voci, Alberto., and Miles Hewstone. “Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6 (1), (2003): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001011
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sidra Farhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
